Thursday, July 18, 2013

Barbara Stanwyck Blogathon: Witness to Murder, 1954


**Me humble contribution to the Barbara Stanwyck Blogathon (July 16-22) hosted by that effervescent nut Aubyn Eli at The Girl With The White Parasol.**

 My first thought watching Roy Rowland's 1954 thriller noir Witness to Murder was that it toted a proto-feminist message of the trials and tribulations that befall a smart, capable woman who is slapped down by a patriarchal society for insisting on expressing herself. In the case of Barbara Stanwyck's interior decorator turned amateur sleuth Cheryl Draper, expressing that the murder she saw actually happened and not in her dream leads to a whole heap of humiliation and isolation.

My father acknowledged this theme, then pointed out another: Witness to Murder is an allegory of the period after WWI and before WWII when no one took the threat of rising Nazism seriously. The exploits of the Kaiser had been so grossly exaggerated by the propaganda machine that complacent Americans were hesitant to take Hitler seriously as a threat until they had to.

Witness to Murder is both these things, allegory of war ignorance and feminine oppression. But what it isn't is particularly great.

The cinematography bathes the beginning in the noirest shades of noir; first the outline of the branches over Stanwyck's fitfully sleeping face, and then plunging George Sanders's oily rat "ex"-Nazi Albert Richter in blackness as he waits with bated breath for an elevator to reach his level, possibly carrying policemen--which would be unfortunate, since he's dragging down the hall the body of the woman that Stanwyck saw him murder from across the street in her apartment, in the dead of night.

My dad is disdainful that George couldn't bother to carry the body.

The film keeps up this heart-pounding noir rhythm, and it mixes well with some of the more leisurely paced scenes. I've become so used to break-neck camera cuts in recent movies that it was rather a sigh of relief when Rowland would take time to show Cheryl enter her home, walk across to her room, pick up the phone, and dial. Little scenes like that do much to make us feel at home with a character.

Of course, that's not hard with an actress like Stanwyck. Her Cheryl Draper is a thankfully unromantic creation, free of soft focus dewyness or even that much sex appeal (one of the most unflattering hair-dos I've ever seen on an actress doesn't hurt). She and Sanders are, unsurprisingly, the principal reason to see this movie. Sanders is at his most perfectly Sandersish here, not even trying for a hint of sympathy. And Cheryl is his match, at least in force of personality.



He explicitly acknowledges this in one of the climactic scenes, trudging out the age-old "we are not so different, you and I; in a different life, we could have even been friends" villain/hero exchange. What's refreshing is that the heroic half is not some Harrison Ford or James Bond or Captain Kirk or Phillip Marlowe gumshoe, but a worn-out, prickly, beaten but not beat woman bordering on middle age. 

Rowland and screenwriter Chester Erskine (with uncredited work from Nunnally Johnson) go to great lengths to demonstrate how, well, single Cheryl is. The next we see of her after the beginning sequence when she witnesses the murder is her mailbox from the policemen's point of view:


The "miss" is scrawled on in someone's (presumably Cheryl's) hand, sticking out largely from the typed out names surrounding her. She wears her single status and her age like a scarlet letter that spells out "Anything She Says Must Be Filtered Through Crazy Spinster Speak." And it's this unfortunate label that keeps her from being similar to Sanders's Richter in ways that would be to her advantage in the story.

Once she calls the police, Gary Merrill as Detective Larry Mathews and Jesse White as his wisecracking rabbity partner Eddie enter the scene. A slower pair of policemen you'll seldom meet again, and Merrill is the male lead, for crying out loud. If you go by the war ignorance angle, Merrill is the stand-in for the Perfect American: willing at first to give the baddie the benefit of the doubt without evidence to back up Cheryl's claim, but is at last the one to step in and realize what's up.

From a feminist standpoint, he's...problematic. At best.

"You just dreamed it," he coos right away to Cheryl after a cursory sweep of suave Richter's apartment reveals nothing--and Larry himself didn't even glance around at all. He takes away Cheryl's power by downsizing the problem from something that actually happened to something just inside her head. But beyond any contextual study of his character, he's just not a very good judge of people. He thinks Richter is an all right guy (how casually he mentions Richter's an ex-Nazi!), he dismisses the murder victim as the "wrong kind of girl", and he's surprised that casually mentioning that Cheryl's fiance was killed in an air raid "still hurts." He means well in the end, but plenty of well-meaning lunks have said and done terrible, terrible things. 

His relationship with Cheryl is ill-defined. Their characters have zero romantic chemistry, yet she's obviously his primary concern throughout, even if to point out that she's hysterical and wrong. Sometimes I wonder if they're even supposed to be romantic interests--maybe, just maybe, he's able to chip away through his sexist blind spots and simply find her interesting--a good friend. I doubt a movie even as ahead of its time in a lot of ways as this one would go that outrageously far, but who knows.

Cheryl seems swayed at first by his dream line, but quickly smells bullshit. She knows, deep down, what she saw.


Like Richter, she's a quick thinker and crafty liar, up to a point. She manipulates her way into his apartment (what kind of landlord does Richter have? I'm sorry, that can't be legal), snoops around subtly, and unwisely swipes a piece of jewelry she figures must belong to the victim. 

And here's where her similarity to Richter ends: they are both dangerously impetuous, but whereas Richter has the uncanny ability to wear the mask, and create an affable persona to trick the world, Cheryl is incapable of lying about herself, about what kind of person she is. And this combined with her powerless position as a woman gives Richter the upper hand through most of the movie.

He is able to convince the head of the L.A. police department she's insane, helped by the fact he's smooth and collected and she's unable to convince those assembled she believes Richter innocent, because of course she doesn't. Once she realizes her freedom is at stake she loses all composure, disbelieving that an innocent person trying to do right would be the one taken away. Her hurried "I realize now you're not guilty I'm sorry" is delivered too quickly, too desperately, and she comes across as the perfect image of the hysterical older woman not able to separate fantasy from reality.


The scene in the sanitarium is an interesting glance into the world of downtrodden femmes driven mad by their own labels. Claire Carleton as May is particularly effective as a seemingly "hey, sister, listen here" moll type, until slowly the camera reveals the crazed desperation in her eyes, and she speaks about all the men in love with her, including the doctor keeping her prisoner here. Juanita Moore (credited as "Negress" here, stay classy, 1950s Hollywood) also makes an impression as the patient who finally pushes May too far singing bitterly of love lost.


While there's realism a-plenty in this scene, I can't say there's a lot of human sympathy, particularly when Cheryl shudders thinking about her companions a few days later when she's freed: "It was ghastly...you should have seen the ones I've been living with the past two days." There's much more sympathy for Cheryl's plight (after all, despite everything, she is not the "wrong kind of girl"). The scene before she's released when she has an interview with the clinically detached sanitarium doctor is the most realistic, chilling, and somehow heart-rending scene.


The spacious, sterile room the doctor meets her in is filmed with her entering from far away; she's isolated from the doctor, from this world she finds herself in. The bars outside the window are silhouetted over the chair meant for her.

Again Rowland wisely takes his time with this scene, though nothing of great shock or import occurs. Still our hearts are a little bit in our throats for Cheryl. She presents herself better here than in the police station, but you see the paralyzed nerves in her face and awkward stance as she looks for a reaction, any kind of reaction from the cold and emotionless doctor (well played by Lewis Martin). He simply recites his questions at a rapid-fire, probing pace, never making eye contact.

What's so unnerving is the sense that there must have been some real research (or even real experience) packed into this scene; it's so lacking in any physical drama that this sort of visceral suspense must have happened on a regular basis to mental patients under review--probably still happens.

The entire sanitarium sequence is a strange interlude, interrupting the action but heightening our sympathy and rage on Cheryl's behalf. The sequence also illustrates what it must have been like for mentally unstable people trying to get back on their feet, and how that process is even more psychologically grueling than any initial breakdown.


Unfortunately, once Cheryl returns the movie devolves straight into a cliche thriller melodrama. The climax is idiotic, with this heretofore intelligent heroine sacrificing what we know about her character for the ludicrous machinations of the plot--leaving the safety of a policewoman escort when Richter tries to throw her out her window and running instead...to the top of a construction site, with Richter right behind her (followed by an old-timey mob of befuddled townfolk! "Some crazy dame's tryin' to kill herself!").

However, this grab bag of camp and noir is perfect for Sanders to really sink his tiger fangs into. He's Hannibal Lecter without the cannibalism--classy, into the finer things, digs murder and thinks it's great, and totally cuckoo. The most ridiculous yet soul-satisfying scene, and one where Sanders is at his finest playing his stock villain type, is when Cheryl confronts him in his apartment. He knows she can't harm him now that she has a recorded history of mental illness with an established "idee fixe" on him. So he revels in telling her that, yes, he killed the Stewart woman because she was probably mucking up his marriage plans to a rich widow and because, y'know, as a fascist he likes killing inferior specimens. 


As his rambling monologue rapidly uncovers the depths of his insanity, the camera approaches him from a low angle, emphasizing Sanders's looming height and crazy eyes. He at last breaks into German and kisses Cheryl, in love with the "hate" in her eyes.

Sanders relishes this trash, and makes the whole nonsense come alive in the most deliciously hammy way conceivable.

His and Stanwyck's teamwork, along with the surprisingly progressive messages hidden here and there, makes Witness to Murder definitely worth seeing. That the movie shifts away from a psychoanalytical take on the Rear Window plot and nosedives into standard action mode, and that some of these progressive themes are either ham-handed or made null by the poor execution or lack of real sympathy, keeps it from being a truly memorable or good movie.

But just take a look at George Sanders's crazy eyes and tell me you don't want to see this movie. You can't, can you? I knew it.

*****
Thanks for this opportunity to yak about Babs and weird film noir, Aubyn! I have a packed rest of this week ahead of me, but come the weekend, I hope to sit down, read the rest of the surely wonderful posts about Missy, and comment away.


19 comments:

  1. Excellent review of a great little thriller. Although these films were a dime a dozen in the 1950s it's amazing how they still managed to make them entertaining, even when we watch them 60 years later. And you're quite right, Stanwyck and Sanders really make this film. With other actors it would of been a yawner. On a side note, if I saw a woman stumbling along a high construction scaffolding today, I'd turn into that befuddled townfolk in a flash and shout "Look at that crazy dame trying to kill herself!". Some things never get old....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. OH, me too! Especially because Barbara didn't help her case any grabbing random people and screaming in their faces, "HE'S TRYING TO KILL ME" and then lumbering off. You're kind of being your own worst enemy here, Missy!

      Thanks for your review!

      Delete
  2. Wonderful look at this "little" film. "Witness to Murder" had escaped my notice entirely until the last decade, but I can't count how many times I have seen it since. It really gets under your skin, and your analysis explains many of the reasons why.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you! Yeah, it's got such a crazy mix of unconventional elements that you can't help but go back to it, huh?

      Delete
  3. This sounds like a very interesting noir. I will hope to see it and return to read your great in-depth review again. Judy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you! It's streaming on Netflix if you have an account.

      Delete
  4. I've not seen this film, but your well-written review still sounds like an excellent analysis. (I really can't believe I haven't seen a film with both George Sanders AND Barbara Stanwyck!!)

    Like "movieclassics" in the comments above, I'll have to watch this film then come back to see how impressions match up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you! I'd love to hear your thoughts.

      Delete
  5. I how always felt that how Cheryl is treated in the film is more reflective of how many men tried to put women "back in their place" after WWII. From the Jazz Age to starting to work outside the home in the 30s and "manning" the home front during the war, women had gone to far. Movies, radio, television, fashion all tried to restore the submissive female. If you were slightly older, like Barbara's character, then you were beyond reconstruction, and, therefore, nuts.

    Fleeing police protection near the end makes sense to me because the police have offered her anything but protection.

    BTW: I think Barbara's hair looks fine. Many 50s styles tended to make women look more matronly. Yet another example of the post-war push back. (I'm particularly sensitive to this as it so directly affected my mother's generation, and, thereby, by own.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are spot-on about the "back in their place" angle! Especially if you look at Cheryl's career: she wants to be an artist, which is a very independent and edgy career, especially for a woman in those times, but finds herself in a "safer" job. That's definitely reflective of the whole "Oh, little lady, that big tough machinery ain't for you! Don't worry, the man's back from the war to take that dirty work off your hands. And look here, a brand new oven! Mmmmm!" "But...but I sorta like the machinery--" "Shh now. Oven."

      True, at this point, Cheryl has been practically driven mad by lack of support from the law, so it does make sense she wouldn't trust them. Still, I can't help but slap my forehead when she runs up to the top of the construction scaffold.

      You should be sensitive to this sort of topic, every woman should! No matter what generation we're born in, it's important to remember that things weren't always so easy and aren't always so easy now.

      Although I think we'll have to agree to disagree about Barbara's hair. There is much I like about women's fashion back then, but the hair a lot of the time? Ehhhhhh....

      Thank you so much for your insightful thoughts!

      Delete
  6. Yes! Yes! I want to see this film! Missy & George Sanders? How the heck did I miss it? Thanks for a super post. Gotta go and locate this movie.....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know, right? And boy, do sparks fly between them: angry, seething, sexy sparks. And like I mentioned to movieclassics above, it's currently streaming on Netflix!

      Thanks for the comment, FlickChick!

      Delete
  7. The fifties were unkind to Stanwyck's hairstyles. I don't think she had a flattering do for the rest of her career. Pity.

    (see also: Ava Gardner).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Deborah Kerr especially had a do that made me cringe in An Affair to Remember. I thought she looked so sleek and pretty in the nightclub scene when her hair was smoothed back, so it was such a shame that the rest of the time she had to have those severe, short, tight curls, like Stanwyck has here.

      Thanks for the comment, Vulnavia!

      Delete
  8. Saw this one a couple years ago and liked it...Stanwyck giving her dependably good best efforts and I cannot pass up George Sanders playing a villain in a movie! Liked your mention of his tiger fangs-I always tell my kids if he's in a movie I am watching that he is Sher Khan from Jungle Book, his voice they know! Great post!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your kids are going to be awesome if you're watching George Sanders movies around them. I remember reading a cute story about how late in his career he worked on a movie with Shirley Jones, and one day her little boy visited the set and Sanders read French Batman comics to him. ADORABLE.

      Thanks for the comment!

      Delete
  9. I've been saving up this review like a great dessert and now I will finally indulge in the weird charms of Witness to Murder and George Sanders the Nazi Boy Next Door.

    "...effervescent nut..." I prefer the term blithe lunatic ;).

    Clearly your dad passed along some great film critic genes to you since his theory on Witness to Murder is quite clever and one I didn't consider before. When I saw it, I pretty much took it the way you did. A dark warning to women that people would rather believe an ex-Nazi white supremacist with the oh-so-trustworthy demeanor of George Sanders than a woman.

    While I'm kind of charmed by the movie's willingness to go right over the top and back again (especially with Sanders' "love in hate" speech) I can't help wondering what it could have been with a subtler villain. If Stanwyck and Sanders had actually been given space to develop a believable chemistry before she witnesses the crime. Then it might be more believable when the police dismiss her as a woman with an obsessive fixation on a guy. Instead, they're all, "Hmm, a German who wrote a book about the innate superiority of certain people? Seems like a stand-up guy to us."

    And there really is no plausible defense of that climax on the scaffold. Up to that point though, I appreciate that Stanwyck keeps her performance quite restrained and nuanced, doing her best to convey an impatient intelligence that's slowly being smothered. Your description of Cheryl's character and her ordeal is very apt and sensitively expressed. She really can't dissemble at all and it almost destroys her.

    As good as Stanwyck is though, I think the best line reading goes to Sanders. There's a moment where he tells her, "You're so intelligent," just purring the line at her and beaming and it's either daffily sincere or epically sarcastic.

    While Witness to Murder is enjoyable, I do wish I could jump in my Time Machine and suggest a romantic comedy where Stanwyck and Sanders play rival thieves a la Trouble in Paradise. They would have made a damn intriguing pair.

    Fantastic review, Laura. I'm very glad you decided to join the blogathon.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ooh, I'm dessert! I feel fancy! (And the Hannibal references keep piling on).

      I'll pass on the compliment to my pater, he'll be thrilled. I introduced your blog to him and he's been a big fan ever since. Yeah, what kills me is how casual everyone is that Sanders is an ex-Nazi. "Well, he was de-Nazified!" Really?? Just never be a single woman older than 40 in the '50s, I guess. Never pays off.

      I appreciate that Stanwyck keeps her performance quite restrained and nuanced, doing her best to convey an impatient intelligence that's slowly being smothered. Your description of Cheryl's character and her ordeal is very apt and sensitively expressed. She really can't dissemble at all and it almost destroys her. THAT's what I was trying to say and it took me only about thirty paragraphs to do so. Cheryl's just so worn down by movie's end, but Stanwyck's brittle steeliness keeps her appropriately accusatory throughout.

      While Witness to Murder is enjoyable, I do wish I could jump in my Time Machine and suggest a romantic comedy where Stanwyck and Sanders play rival thieves a la Trouble in Paradise. They would have made a damn intriguing pair. Damn you, Aubyn. Damn you. Now I'm going to be crying all night because that never happened.

      Thank you once again for your insightful take, Aubyn! You're a lunatic, but you're so blithe about it that I just can't turn you in!

      Delete
  10. Yes, George Sanders' eyes made me want to see the movie, but your review was what called my attention first! Thanks for the analyses!
    Don't forget to read my contribution to the blogathon! :)
    Kisses!

    ReplyDelete